Opinion: US Arctic Report Card is incomplete without tackling solutions
|Washington, D.C., 14 Dec 2021|
In an article in The Hill co-authored by Durwood Zaelke of the Institute for Governance & Sustainable Development (IGSD), the writers say that "The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is expected to release its 2021 Arctic Report Card this week, covering topics from loss of sea ice to thawing permafrost and wildfires.
Although the science behind the report card will be impeccable, the report itself will deserve no better grade than an “incomplete” if it fails to discuss measures to protect the Arctic".
They point out that "The Arctic plays an essential role regulating the global climate. But as past NOAA’s Report Cards show, the Arctic is unraveling rapidly. It's no longer enough to measure and observe the ticking climate time bomb at the top of the world. International policy-makers, starting with the United States and the seven other countries of the Arctic Council, need to focus on how to protect this crucial region’s role in preventing climate destabilization".
The article concludes that world leaders should not sign off on NOAA’s Arctic Report Card without taking a hard look at its findings. They must initiate a process to define the Arctic we need for a safe climate, and then develop all-of-government and global strategies to get us there.
On 8 December 2010 the Institute for Environmental Security, in collaboration with the European Space Agency, organised a workshop on 'The Future of Space Cooperation in the Arctic Region'.
The event, held at the European Space Agency Headquarters in Paris, aimed to promote the dialogue on environmental security in the Arctic region and had the following specific objectives:
IES assisted in the organisation of the first Planetary Security Conference: Peace and Cooperation in Times of Climate Change and Global Environmental Challenges held at the Peace Palace in The Hague on 2-3 November 2015. Organised by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, it brought together practitioners and experts from the defense, aid, and foreign policy community to discuss the impact of climate change and other global environmental challenges on security.
Among the 12 Working Groups in the conference co-organised by IES was Working Group 8: Arctic Security & Conflicting Interests
As the world’s attention turns to the rapidly changing Arctic, new interests are projected into an already complex landscape. This group discussed how the interactions of these multiple interests challenge conventional concepts and approaches to security.
>> Read the full Arctic Working Group Report including the conclusions and recommendations.
* National Snow & Ice Data Center (NSIDC), ‘Arctic sea ice news and analysis’ (2015) http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/2015/10/2015-melt-season-in-review as quoted in WORKING GROUP 8: ARCTIC SECURITY AND CONFLICTING INTERESTS in Planetary Security: Peace and Cooperation in Times of Climate Change and Global Environmental Challenges: Conference Report / 2-3 November 2015, Shirleen Chin and Ronald A. Kingham (Editors), Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands, The Hague, January 2016